The Silver Deficit
(1942-2004) David Zurbuchen February 25,
2006 Editor of www.silverinscripture.com Free Silver Stock Investment Newsletter This is the 2nd installment of a planned 7-part series: Part 1 – The World’s
Cumulative Silver and Gold Production. Documenting the total amount of silver and gold produced since recorded
history. *Part 2 –The Silver Deficit. Documenting the silver supply/demand deficit since 1942. Part 3 – The Real Silver Deficit. Answering the questions of “How much silver has been consumed by industry?” and “In what potentially marketable accessible forms does it remain?” Part 4 – The Illogical Performance of the Gold to Silver ratio Since 1848. A look at silver and gold’s comparative production growth since 1848. Part 5 – Why the Depressed Prices? A brief look at the amount of silver and gold stockpiles held throughout
the 1900’s and the resultant pressure they placed on upward prices movements as
they were liquidated. Part 6 – What Happened in 1980? Did production increase? Did extraordinary amounts of scrap silver come
to market? Part 7 – The Future of Silver. An overview of silver’s
fundamentals, price predictions, and some intriguing price ratio comparisons
between silver and other commodities. Preface “Because of the long-term
structural deficit in silver, stretching back to World War II, we have consumed
inventories for more than 60 years.” -Ted Butler, “The Coming Silver
Bubble” This essay will seek to prove what Mr. Butler and other silver bulls
have been confidently asserting for so long, that is, the claim that silver has
experienced a supply/demand deficit which stretches back all the way to 1942. The Silver Deficit One problem with documenting the silver deficit is that world consumption
rates are almost non-existent prior to 1955, at least according to my research. If this
data is available, please bring it to my attention. But despite the lack of official figures, one can know to a fairly
accurate degree how much ‘deficit’ has accumulated worldwide in the years prior
to 1955 through the use of some comparative math. In order to accomplish this, we must first obtain US silver consumption data. Then, in order to determine the total world
consumption of silver, we simply find what percentage of the world’s
consumption the From the Minerals Yearbook
1932-1933 (pg. 18) we discover that total world industrial and arts consumption
of silver was 91.4 million ounces in 1930 and 70.1 million ounces in 1931,
whereas By looking at US industrial and arts consumption from 1956-1960, we find
that on average the What this 45% figure means is that I will assume US industrial and arts consumption
of silver represented 45% of the world’s total in all the years where only US
consumption data is known, namely 1901-1954.
We can then find the estimated total world industrial consumption during
these years by dividing the Finding the total world consumption including coinage also presented a
problem due to lack of data between 1901 and 1954. I would like to think I estimated to a fairly
accurate degree, but if in fact I have not, I nevertheless remain fairly unconcerned
because this value will be shown in Part 3 to be of only minor significance in
the quest to obtain the true silver deficit.
Some Important Notes
Concerning the Table Shown Below* *The importance of this information may become more apparent in Part 3 of
this series when the total amount of silver consumed by industry is calculated
using several methods to account for some of the ambiguity within the Minerals Yearbooks. 1901-1954: It is somewhat ambiguous whether or not world
industrial and arts consumption given in the Minerals Yearbooks during this period is a measure of net
consumption (i.e. demand – recycled scrap) or simply total consumption
regardless of scrap supply. In the years
prior to 1955 it seems clear that at least the US numbers do represent
net consumption, and using this data I have approximated net world consumption
using the 45% US to World ratio obtained above*. Net industrial demand in the words of the
Minerals Yearbooks is “silver issued for industrial use minus silver returned
from industrial use.” Following 1955, US
numbers still seem to describe net consumption/demand, but at the same time world
consumption numbers are not at all clear.
Regarding these issues of misunderstanding, representatives of the
United States Geological Survey (USGS) were unable to answer my questions. Therefore, I will evaluate the total silver
deficit in Part 3 from several different angles, making use of various
combinations of the data sets. *Approximations were
only necessary through the year 1954. In
all the years following, with one exception (1994), world demand is known
without having to calculate estimates based upon US consumption numbers. 1955-1984: World Consumption totals are free-world only, and
are therefore underreported by an estimated 30-60+ million ounces per year
based upon an annual production from communist countries of 35-55 million
ounces during this period (see the year 1985 in the chart below for reference). This is important because during this same
period total world production adds
the estimated production from communist countries into the total, thus
explaining why in some years there appears to be no deficit at all when in reality
the deficit continued (e.g. 1955 and 1981-1985). 1955-1994: As was alluded to above, total
world industrial and arts consumption numbers and total world consumption
numbers during this period are somewhat ambiguous, again because they could be
representative of either net demand or simply total demand. While the US consumption totals are usually
identified as ‘net demand’ within the Minerals
Yearbooks, it is not clear if world demand/consumption totals are meant to
mean the same thing, even while the US and world totals are at times
described with the exact same wording. Ø ‘e.’ stands for estimated Ø All years in RED are years in which there was a worldwide
supply/demand deficit (1942-2004). Ø Industrial and arts consumption stands for total
silver demand (i.e. photography, jewelry, electronics, etc.) minus coinage
demand. Ø Many years have two quoted values for various
calculations, one net (i.e. total demand - scrap) and the other total (i.e. not
factoring in scrap supply). Lastly, I
highly recommend you read the quoted material inserted between the yearly data
within the following chart. Many gems are enclosed, I assure you of this. One such entry mentions that the Total World Silver Consumption (1901-2004) (Reported in millions of ounces, with the
exception of the totals) Source: Minerals Yearbook
(1901-1994) Source: The Silver Institute
(1995-2004)
Shown below are two methods of calculating Communist demand of
industrial use silver for the period 1939-1984: ·
By estimating an
additional demand of 40 million ounces per year for this 46 year period and
adding it to the total we arrive at 30.1215 billion ounces + 1.84
billion ounces = 31.9615 billion ounces ·
By
estimating an additional demand of 60 million ounces per year for this 46 year
period and adding it to the total we arrive at 30.1215 billion ounces + 2.76
billion ounces = 32.8815 billion ounces By adding the coinage demand during the years 1901-2004 (an
estimated 4.0651 billion ounces) to the previous total of 32.8815 billion
ounces we arrive at a grand total demand
for silver of 36.9466 billion ounces since the turn of the 20th
century. And there you have it folks.
Despite the phenomenal increase in mine production since 1800 (see below),
every year since 1942 the world has demanded more silver than has been produced. Therefore,
silver has experienced a phenomenal 63 year long supply/demand
deficit as of year-end 2004. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
With a total production of 30.7144 billion ounces and a total demand of perhaps 36.9466 billion ounces, an amazing
supply/demand deficit of 6.2322 billion
ounces has accumulated since 1901. However, if one begins at the pivot year of 1942, then the total
supply/demand deficit is actually the staggering figure of 10.6567 billion ounces, the
necessary result of a 63 year supply/demand deficit. The
difference between this number and the 6.2332 billion ounce deficit quoted
above is due entirely to the mine supply surplus years of 1901-1941. What
Next? In Part 3 of this series
we’ll search for the answers to those long pondered questions of old,
befuddling great philosophers and thinkers throughout the ages: ·
What is the real silver deficit (i.e. how much silver
has literally been consumed by industry?) o Making
use of recycling rates for silver in order to determine just how much ‘disappeared’. ·
How much silver is left above-ground and in what
potentially market accessible forms? o Discovering
how much silver has been formed into jewelry, silverware, coins, etc. since 1901
and how much possibly remains. o Learning
what price levels silver must climb to before these forms of silver are likely
to be sold in any large quantities back into the market. Well, okay, so maybe Plato and Socrates didn’t lose much sleep
over the questions above, but for those invested in silver or merely contemplating
it, such may be the case. If so, don’t
worry, because you’ll rest easy soon enough. A Preview of Part 3: From the CRA Report:
Silver Stocks Around the World An independent study conducted in 1992 by Charles
River Associates (Totals as of year-end 1991) Total Silver that remains
above-ground (all forms): 19.06 billion
ounces Total Silver contained in
silverware and art forms: 16.48 billion
ounces Total Silver contained in
bullion form: 1.40 billion ounces Total Silver contained in
coin and medallion form: 1.18 billion
ounces Updating the Data 1992-1994: World
mine production of silver during this period totaled 1.373 billion ounces (Minerals
Yearbooks) 1995-2004: World
mine production of silver during this period totaled 5.639 billion ounces (The Silver Institute) Total World Mine
Production from 1992 to 2004 = 7.012 billion ounces Combining this number
with the CRA Report’s estimated total above-ground supply of 19.06 billion
ounces, we arrive at 26.07 billion ounces of silver remaining above
ground. Here then is our
new gold to silver rarity ratio based solely upon relative rarity. 4.25 billion ounces Au /26.07 billion ounces
Ag (see
Part 1) = 1
to 6.13 (Gold
vs. Silver) This means that based on relative
abundance, silver should be trading at around $91.10/ounce (using a gold price of $558.5) Please note that
this doesn’t even take into account the large deficit formed since the CRA
Report was conducted in 1992. But we’ll
deal more with all of this in Part 3.
This was just a taste. I will be using
the CRA Report as a yardstick with which to compare my findings in Part 3 of
this series. If the numbers are similar,
then we can be fairly certain these findings are accurate. Corrections to Part 1 of this Series: 1. A few mathematical errors were made while tabulating the
world’s cumulative silver production, and all together these have the effect of
raising the average total up from 44.542 billion ounces to 45.552 billion
ounces (a 2.3% increase). This also
slightly changes the gold to silver ratio of cumulative production, from 1:10.5
up to 1:10.7 (a 1.9% increase). 2. Two very minor mistakes were also made in tabulating the
world’s cumulative gold production, but even added together they changed the
average world total by less than 0.001%. 3. I wrote: Most
would agree that neither gold nor silver is undervalued
in terms of the dollar, so the only way to look at this situation is to say
that silver is undervalued in terms of the dollar and gold. This means that I
expect silver to far outperform any gains seen in the price of gold, even if
gold doubles or triples in price within these next 2 years. This should have
read, “most (readers of www.gold-eagle.com at least) would agree that both gold
and silver are undervalued in terms of the dollar”. In other words, the dollar is overvalued in
terms of gold and silver. Contact:
david@silverinscripture.com I
offer a FREE Silver Stock Investment Newsletter for which you are invited to
subscribe. I focus on junior precious
and base metals producers and explorers, as well as a variety of natural
resource stocks. Presently, there are over
1500 subscribers from 25 different countries all over the world. To join, please visit: www.silverinscripture.com |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||